Legal Opinion

Williams v. Shepherd

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 4, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hurt

Affirming.

*536On the 29th day of July, 1912, the appellant, J. P. Williams, purchased from the appellee, Samuel Shepherd, through an agent of the appellee, International Harvester Company, a threshing machine, for which he promised to pay the sum of $563.35. For the purchase price, he, together with the other appellants, as his sure-' ties, executed three promissory notes, one for the sum of $148.35, due on the 15th day of September, 1912; one for the sum of $207.00, due on the 29th day of July, 1913; and one for the sum of $208.00, due on September 15th, 1914.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hauss v. SurranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Glover Machine Works v. Cooke-Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. Miller v. GaitherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867
  5. Cook v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'Bryan v. Mengel CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Ades v. WashCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Louisville Point Lumber Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Coleman v. SowdersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  5. Automatic Equipment Co. v. MohneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API