United States v. Irvinspence
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CREAN, Senior Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty, by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members, of failing to obey a lawful regulation, rape, and unlawful entry, in violation of Articles 92, 120, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 920, and 934 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for three years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El.
This court denied the appellant’s petition for new trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. PalmerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. Bonano-TorresUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. WilliamsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. CarrollU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. HayesU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. PierceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. SanchezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. ZaissArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.