Legal Opinion

United States v. Irvinspence

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 22, 1994No. ACMR 9102640PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CREAN, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty, by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members, of failing to obey a lawful regulation, rape, and unlawful entry, in violation of Articles 92, 120, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 920, and 934 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for three years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El.

This court denied the appellant’s petition for new trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. PalmerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. Bonano-TorresUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. WilliamsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. CarrollU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  2. United States v. HayesU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1994
  3. United States v. PierceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. SanchezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  5. United States v. ZaissArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API