Legal Opinion

Marx v. Beard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 2, 1956No. 37202PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

This appeal arose out of an action to quiet title instituted in -February, 1955, by defendant in error, as plaintiff,' to-quiet his title against plaintiffs in error, who are husband and wife, as defendánts, to an undivided one-half interest in the minerals underlying a certain tract of land. The parties will hereinafter be referred to by their trial court designations.

According to the undisputed facts established at the trial, it was several years after defendants had mortgaged said land to the Federal Land Bank, and while it remained so encumbered, that defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colby v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Hanlon v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Triangle Royalty Corp. v. GravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Morris v. LainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  5. Rennie v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucus v. CowanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Wood v. SympsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Grisham v. Southland Royalty CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Singer-Fleischaker Royalty Co. v. WhisenhuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Strickland v. ReeburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API