Legal Opinion
Steshenko v. Gayrard
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 29, 2014No. Case No.: 13-CV-03400-LHKPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Gregory Nicholas Steshenko (“Plaintiff’) brings this action for age discrimination and retaliation based on not being admitted to three graduate programs at San Jose State University. Defendants Suzanne Gayrard, Tzvina Abram-son, and the Board of Trustees of the California State University (collectively, “Defendants”) move to dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 46. Having considered the parties’ briefs and…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re Animation Workers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Deanco Healthcare, LLC v. BecerraDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Cooper v. TakayamaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
- Fischer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Marshall Wexler v. Starbucks Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.