Legal Opinion

Marshall Wexler v. Starbucks Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 31, 2026No. 4:25-cv-00349Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 MARSHALL WEXLER, Case No.: 4:25-CV-00349-YGR 5 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISQUALIFY 6 Plaintiff, JUDGE; 7 v. DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 8 STARBUCKS CORPORATION AND WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS 9 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 33, 35, and 36. 10 11 Before the Court are (1) plaintiff’s motion to disqualify Judge Gonzalez Rogers under 28

12 U.S.C. section 455

(Dkt. No. 33), (2) defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) motion 13 to strike plaintiff’s First…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API