Legal Opinion
People v. Moore
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Leon A. Beerman, J.
The main question presented in this case is whether a *901criminal defendant is denied his State constitutional right to counsel when he is placed in a holding pen in the courthouse awaiting Criminal Court arraignment and then, after a lengthy delay, the reason for which is not explained, he is taken out of the pen for interrogation and arraigned only after he has given inculpatory statements to the authorities. This court answers the question in the affirmative, and accordingly, orders the inculpatory statements suppressed.
Defendant Roman Moore is charged…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. BallottNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. ZahreyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- People v. DiazNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. MooreNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. McCoyCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1997