Legal Opinion
United States v. Zahrey
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 29, 1997No. 96 CR 0910(NG)(JMA)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GERSHON, District Judge:
Defendants’ pre-trial motions to suppress certain statements were referred to the Honorable Joan M. Azrack, Magistrate Judge, for report and recommendation. Defendants Zahrey, Sandoval and Mercado have filed objections to Judge Azraek’s report, dated April 1, 1996, wMch recommended demal of all motions. Review under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is de novo. See United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315, 328 (2d Cir.1995).
I now adopt Judge Azrack’s factual findings and legal conclusions. Her reports sets forth the facts with admirable clarity, and it comprehensively, and…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WernerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- State v. LondaginMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. TallyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- United States v. FamilettiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- United States v. GottiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.