Legal Opinion
Leshara State Bank v. Hoagland
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1935No. 29074PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.
This is, in substance, an action at law upon a promissory note in the following form:
“$2,750. Leshara, Nebraska, June 12th, 1930.
“On demand, after date, we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of the, Leshara State Bank, Leshara, Nebraska, twenty-seven hundred fifty dollars. For value received, negotiable and payable at the Leshara State Bank, Leshara, Nebraska, with interest,” etc. (Signed) “J. R. Magley, Mrs. J. R. Magley, Geo. Hoagland.”
George Hoagland died and a claim in usual form, based upon this note, was filed in the matter of deceased’s estate in the county court of Saunders…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dies v. Wilson County BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- O'Neil v. MagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hatchings v. EdmandsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Fenno v. GayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Peter v. FinzerNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ballantyne Company v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
- Gonschior v. DrewesNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. KidderNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Continental Oil Co. v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Gonschior v. DrewesNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.