Legal Opinion

Reffalt v. Reffalt

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided December 13, 2011No. 2010-CA-01013-COAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ISHEE, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. In 1993, Stephen and Gloria Reffalt were granted an irreconcilable-differences divorce, ending nearly four decades of marriage. Their property-settlement agreement provided that Stephen would pay approximately $1,600 per month in alimony, an amount stated to be one-half of his monthly retirement income. In December 2008, Stephen filed a petition to modify the alimony payments. According to Stephen, his retirement income had been reduced since the divorce. Stephen contended that the property-settlement agreement required monthly alimony be reduced proportionally —…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ArmstrongMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Newsom v. NewsomMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Rotenberry v. HookerMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Hamilton v. HopkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  5. West v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Enniss Family Realty I, LLC v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2013
  2. Edmond Clark v. Mary WesleyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2020
  3. Trustmark National Bank v. Enlightened Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API