Legal Opinion

Hartsfield v. Lemacks

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 14, 1995No. 93-9298PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

This case arises out of an entry by law enforcement agents into the wrong residence to execute a presumably valid search warrant for a nearby house. Plaintiffs-Appellants Leonard and Mattie Hartsfield contest the district court’s grant of summary judgment on, and dismissal of, their constitutional claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND.

I

“[T]he issue of a government official’s qualified immunity from suit presents a question of law, and ‘like the generality of such questions, must be resolved de novo on appeal.’ ”…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Norelus v. Denny's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Byron Keith ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Daniel Lugo v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Larketta Randolph, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama and Green Tree Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Carl J. Isaacs v. Frederick J. HeadCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API