Legal Opinion

Hungry Wolf/Sugar & Spice, Inc. v. Langdeau

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 29, 2016No. A16A1442PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Judge.

Richard Langdeau, Jr., and Ashley Langdeau (the “Langdeaus”) filed suit against Hungry Wolf/Sugar & Spice (“Hungry Wolf”), alleging that Hungry Wolf was vicariously liable for the tortious actions of its alleged employee, and that it negligently hired and retained the employee. The trial court denied Hungry Wolf’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that a police report submitted by the Langdeaus created a question of fact as to whether the tortfeasor was employed by Hungry Wolf. We granted Hungry Wolf’s application for interlocutory review. On appeal, Hungry Wolf argues…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cowart v. WidenerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. Steed v. Federal National Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Baker v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Koules v. Sp5 Atlantic Retail Ventures, LLC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Capital City Developers, LLC v. Bank of North GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. Samadi v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  3. Glenn Goodhart v. Atlanta Gas Light CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  4. Myra Little v. Jim-Lar CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  5. Woody v. TuckerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API