Legal Opinion

Woody v. Tucker

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided June 19, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00785Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION Millanyo Woody, #227810, Case No.: 2:19-cv-00785-SAL Petitioner, v. OPINION AND ORDER Warden Tucker, Respondent. Petitioner filed this action seeking a writ of habeas corpus on March 15, 2019. ECF No. 1. On June 6, 2019, Respondents filed a Return and Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF Nos. 10, 11. On October 17, 2019, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civ. Rule. 73.02(B)(2)(c) (D.S.C.), United States Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”). ECF No. 18. In the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API