State v. Baggett
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, C.J.
The State charged Cecil Steven Baggett with the offense of second degree assault. Following a bench trial, the court found that Mr. Baggett was suffering from diminished capacity at the time he committed the conduct in question. Hence, he could not form the specific intent that is required for assault. See State v. Byrd, 125 Wn.2d 707, 713, 887 P.2d 396 (1995). It therefore acquitted him of that offense. However, the court held that RCW 9.41.270, unlawful display of a firearm, is a lesser included offense of second degree assault, and it convicted him of the lesser *566crime. The court found that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BerlinWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. Fernandez-MedinaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ByrdWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BlairWashington Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PradoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. PradoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State Of Washington v. Ariane Re JeffersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.