Legal Opinion
State v. Baggett
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 30, 2000No. 18744-6-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
13 P.3d 659 (2000)
103 Wash.App. 564
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Cecil Steven BAGGETT, Appellant.
No. 18744-6-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Six.
November 30, 2000.
Hugh M. Spall, Jr., Ellensburg, for Appellant.
Lauri M. Boyd, Deputy Prosecuting Atty., Yakima, for Respondent.
KURTZ, C.J.
The State charged Cecil Steven Baggett with the offense of second degree assault. Following a bench trial, the court found that Mr. Baggett was suffering from diminished capacity at the time he committed the conduct in question. Hence, he could not form the specific intent that is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BerlinWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. Fernandez-MedinaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ByrdWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BlairWashington Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PradoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. PradoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- United States v. Marc WillyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- State Of Washington v. Ariane Re JeffersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.