Legal Opinion
United States v. Sakharam Ganesh Pandit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 1, 1926No. 4938PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating
the facts as above). This court, in Akhay Kumar Mozumdar v. United States (C. C. A.) 299 F. 240, reviewed decree of cancellation of certificate, and in United States v. Siem (C. C. A.) 299 F. 582, reviewed decree denying cancellation, both actions brought under section 15 of the Naturalization Act. The question of res judieata was not presented or considered in either ease. The cumulative remedy provided by sections 11 and 15 (Comp. St. §§ 4370, 4374) in ex parte eases (U. S. v. Thind, 261 U. S. 204, 43 S. Ct. 338, 67 L. Ed. 616) has not been considered by this court or the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Tutun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re: Petition for Naturalization of Charles Peter Duncan. Charles Peter Duncan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Coast Wineries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. KuscheDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
- Fishel v. KiteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Haugen v. Oceanic Fisheries Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.