Pelletier v. Alameda Yacht Harbor
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
In this case we hold that (1) a contractual provision purporting to exculpate a yacht harbor from tort liability to a boat owner was void by statute because it involved the public interest, and (2) stipulated judgment of unlawful detainer had no collateral estoppel effect as to a subsequent cause of action for retaliatory eviction.
Jack and Mary Ann Pelletier appeal from a judgment in their action against Alameda Yacht Harbor (AYH) for negligence and retaliatory eviction. They challenge the court’s rulings that (1) a contractual exculpation clause insulated AYH from liability…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Henrioulle v. Marin Ventures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Barkett v. BrucatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Gardner v. Downtown Porsche AudiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Westlye v. Look Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Malkoskie v. Option One Mortgage Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Landeros v. PankeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Gombiner v. SwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.