Legal Opinion

Pelletier v. Alameda Yacht Harbor

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1986No. A031458PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that (1) a contractual provision purporting to exculpate a yacht harbor from tort liability to a boat owner was void by statute because it involved the public interest, and (2) stipulated judgment of unlawful detainer had no collateral estoppel effect as to a subsequent cause of action for retaliatory eviction.

Jack and Mary Ann Pelletier appeal from a judgment in their action against Alameda Yacht Harbor (AYH) for negligence and retaliatory eviction. They challenge the court’s rulings that (1) a contractual exculpation clause insulated AYH from liability…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Henrioulle v. Marin Ventures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Barkett v. BrucatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Gardner v. Downtown Porsche AudiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Westlye v. Look Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Malkoskie v. Option One Mortgage Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Landeros v. PankeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Gombiner v. SwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API