Legal Opinion

Allen v. Hernon

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1958No. 4041PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

The main question here presented is whether the trial court properly applied the rule, with respect to negotiable instruments, that as between innocent parties, the one whose negligence has occasioned the loss must bear it. The facts establish this case as a classic example for the application of the rule as applied by the district court.(1) The action to set aside a note and trust deed was commenced by the Allens, husband and wife, makers of the note and trust deed involved, against Clark County Mortgage Company, a corporation, payee of the note and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kimbro v. KimbroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Porter v. Tempa Mining & Milling Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Mullikin v. JonesNevada Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Picetti v. OrcioNevada Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Cornett v. MaddinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gross v. LammeNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Neumann v. McMillanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Stewart & Horton Trust Account v. AutrandNevada Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API