Legal Opinion
Picetti v. Orcio
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1936No. 3096PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
An analysis of the testimony will bear out the conclusion that the entire premises was used by one of the partners for the purpose of raising money to carry on and conduct the business for all of them, and that the partnership as a whole, including all of the assets, becomes liable for the payment of the debt. Minter v. Minter, 157 P. 157; Arnold v. Wainwright, 80 Am. Dec. 448.
Real estate acquired and used in the manner in which this property was, will be deemed in equity as the property of the partnership. Whitney v. Dewey, 158 Fed. 385, 86 C.C.A. 21; Adams v. Blumenshine, 204 P. 66; Sumner…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miller v. MarxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Insurance Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Young v. DuvallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Chivington v. Colorado Springs Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- Adams v. BlumenshineNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Goodson & Koski v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
- Allen v. WebbNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Lukey v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1961
- Allen v. HernonNevada Supreme Court · 1958
- Poole v. HyattCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.