Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1963No. Civ. 7356PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

Petitioiaer-appellant Danny Arnold and one Joseph M. Valdez were charged jointly in two counts in the municipal court with violation of Penal Code, section 470 (forgery). The preliminary hearing was set for January 3, 1963. At this hearing, the People were unable to proceed. The transcript of the proceedings in the municipal court shows the presence of defendant Arnold, his attorney and the deputy district attorney. The preliminary examination was called for hearing and all parties said they were ready. The deputy district attorney then announced that an officer of a bank was on call as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CombesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ex parte FentonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Robinson v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. AikenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Stockwell v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Fair v. Fountain Valley School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API