Legal Opinion

People v. Aiken

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1951No. Crim. 2313PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This is an appeal by the prosecution from an order of the Superior Court of Shasta County setting aside an information and dismissing an action against the respondent arising out of an alleged violation of section 502 of the Vehicle Code.

On May 12, 1951, a complaint was filed in the Justice’s Court of Township Number Four, County of Shasta, charging respondent with a violation of section 502 of the Vehicle Code, said violation having occurred in said county on May 11, 1951. On May 15, 1951, a second complaint was filed in the same justice’s court charging respondent with the same violation of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. RingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Donati v. RighettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. People v. HrjakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. People v. BanatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Castro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Wallace v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Arnold v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Jackson v. BeckhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. In Re KriegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API