Ex parte Fenton
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The peti1'ornv bad once been arrested on a charge of grand larceny. Upon an examination before the committing magistrate, he was discharged. Afterwards he was again arrested on the same charge, examined before a different magistrate, and committed for trial. He thereupon applied to be discharged on habeas corpus, on the ground that he had been once in jeopardy. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
The record in this case and the agreed statement upon which it is submitted, taken together, show sufficient cause for issuing the warrant under which defendant is held.
*184The fact that defendant had been previously arrested on the same charge, examined before a magistrate, and discharged, is not a bar to a second arrest and examination.
A person cannot be said to have been once in jeopardy until he is put upon trial before a court of competent jurisdiction, upon indictment or information which is sufficient in form and substance to sustain a conviction, and a jury has been charged with…
2Cited by17 opinions
- People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. PrewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Bryan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- United States Ex Rel. Rutz v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- In re OxleyNevada Supreme Court · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.