Bookman v. Oakland Chemical Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HATFIELD, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences sustaining the opposition of appellee and holding that appellant was not entitled to registration of her trade-mark “Peroxogen” for use on hydrogen peroxide, bleaching compounds, and bleaching powders.
In its notice of opposition, appellee alleged that it was the owner of the trade-mark “Dioxogen” for use on “antiseptic and disinfectant compounds”; that the goods for which appellant’s trade-mark was sought' to be registered possessed the same…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Touraine Co. v. F. B. Washburn & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1923
- Oakland Chemical Co. v. BookmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- California Cyanide Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Miller Brewing Co. v. Carling O'Keefe Breweries of Canada, Ltd.District Court, W.D. New York · 1978
- Skookum Packers' Ass'n v. Pacific Northwest Canning Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Trustees for Arch Preserver Shoe Patents v. James McCreery & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.