Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pflanz v. County Court of Dane County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1967PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The sole question is whether under sec. 954.02 (2), Stats., it appears from the complaint that there is probable cause to believe Otto E. Pflanz, Jr., filed fraudulent tax returns. A complaint is a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged and must be made upon oath before a magistrate or other person empowered to issue warrants of arrest; but the complaint besides alleging the offense must set forth facts showing probable cause before a warrant of an arrest may issue. 1

Prior to 1949 when the provisions of the present sec. 954.02, Stats., were enacted the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Evanow v. SeraphimWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. MabraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. UnnamedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API