Legal Opinion

State v. Unnamed

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1989No. 87-2152-CRPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEFFERNAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.

This is a permissive appeal of an order of the circuit court, denying a motion to dismiss a criminal complaint issued after a John Doe proceeding under sec. 968.26, Stats. The court of appeals certified the appeal to this court pursuant to sec. (Rule) 809.61. We accepted the certification. We affirm Judge Danforth's order.

This case presents the question of whether sec. 968.26, Stats.,1 the John Doe criminal proceeding provision, violates the constitutional doctrine of separation of powers.

This case arose as follows. The complainant alleged that she was sexually…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State Ex Rel. Kurkierewicz v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. BorrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Friedrich v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API