Legal Opinion

Charles P. Anderson, Inc. v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1938No. 31,734PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

This case comes here on a writ of certiorari to review a judgment of the municipal court of the city of St. Paul rendered on appeal from the conciliation court.

Plaintiff was the owner of an automobile which was damaged by one of the defendant’s streetcars. The collision occurred at the intersection of Eighth and Ninth streets with Wabasha street in St. Paul. Eighth street and Ninth street converge at an acute angle easterly of Wabasha street. A single streetcar track of the defendant’s used for westerly bound cars lies upon Ninth street somewhat closer to its northerly side…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mardorf v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Bryant v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Schwartz v. New Orleans & C. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  4. Frank Bird Transfer Co. v. KrugIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Mittleman v. New York City Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Chandler v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API