Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ward v. Durham Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1988No. 872SC790Published

1Dissent

Judge PARKER

dissenting.

Believing as I do that the facts of this case are not distinguishable from Thomas-Yelverton Co. v. Insurance Co., 238 N.C. 278, 77 S.E. 2d 692 (1953), Inman v. Woodmen of the World, 211 N.C. 179, 189 S.E. 496 (1937) and McCrimmon v. N.C. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 69 N.C. App. 683, 317 S.E. 2d 709, disc. rev. denied, 312 N.C. 84, 322 S.E. 2d 175 (1984), I respectfully dissent.

*293In Thomas-Yelverton, supra, the Court stated:

The rule with respect to the knowledge of an agent being imputable to his principal is well stated ... in the following language: “In the absence of fraud or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Northern National Life Insurance v. Lacy J. Miller MacHine Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Tolbert v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Fishblate v. Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Thomas-Yelverton Co. v. State Capital Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Inman v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API