Legal Opinion

State v. . Mickey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 28, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchencic, J.

The basis of one of the defendant’s exceptive assignments of error is the following extract from the court’s charge: “The burden is on the State to satisfy you beyond a reasonable doubt that this defendant is guilty of agreeing together with Griffin or Murphy, or both of them, or others to do an unlawful thing, to wit, kill W. W. Dick, before this defendant would be guilty of violating the law.”

In view of the fact that the indictment charges nominatim the alleged conspirators and is not cum multis aliis, we are constrained to hold that his Honor erred in charging the jury in effect that if…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . DiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. PringleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. RhomeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API