Main Line Engineering Construction Service, Inc. v. Hutcheson

WADDILL, Commissioner.

The main question on this appeal is whether, in a proceeding under KRS 342.-305, service of summons on the local attorney for appellant’s insurance carrier constituted service on the appellant. Before deciding this question we will relate the events leading to its formulation.

Initially, appellee, Herman Hutcheson, filed a claim against appellant, Main Line Engineering Construction Service, Inc. a foreign corporation doing business in Kentucky, seeking compensation pursuant to the provisions of the Kentucky Workmen’s Compensation Act. KRS, Chapter 342. Upon the hearing of…