Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Long v. Cox

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 13, 1879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Mandamus, directed to the judge of the 9th judicial dis- „ triet.

1Opinion of the CourtGxleillan, C. J.

After a verdict for plaintiff in the cause below, in which tbe relators were defendants, tbe defendants made a statement of the case, and the parties stipulated that *215it was correct. The defendants thereupon gave notice of a. motion to have the stipulated ease certified and approved by the judge who tried the case, and of a motion at the same-time for a new trial, upon the ease as certified and approved. These motions appear to have been heard, and the motion for a new trial denied. The motion for the certifying of the case was not then decided, but was subsequently renewed and denied. It…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sherman v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. State v. RonkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. Richardson v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Rhodes v. Board of Public WorksColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. State ex rel. Schmitt v. MacdonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API