Legal Opinion

Paldi v. Paldi

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1893PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to St. Clair. (Mitchell, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings errór. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in the former report of the case.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This case was in this Court at the October term, 1890, and judgment in favor of the plaintiff rendered, affirming the judgment of the court below. 84 Mich. 346. It is an action of ejectment, and defendant took a new trial under the statute. It has been retried, and verdict and judgment again directed in favor of the plaintiff.

The facts are fully stated in the former opinion. It is *411contended, however, that the facts appearing upon this record are materially different from the former. We have examined the record carefully, and find no such difference as to lead to any other conclusion than that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yelverton v. SteeleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Paldi v. PaldiMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Harrett v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Worthley v. BurbanksIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. McVannel v. Pure Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Moran v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kelso v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API