Legal Opinion
Dullanty v. Comstock Development Corp.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 15, 1980No. 3048-2-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.
George and Doris Dullanty appeal the dismissal of their action for specific performance of an ear- . nest money agreement.
On April 20, 1975, George Dullanty offered to purchase an unimproved lot from the respondent, Comstock Development Corporation (Comstock), by signing an earnest money receipt and agreement. The agreement was partially printed and partially typed.
The typed portion of the agreement described the property (Lot 28), the price, and the manner of payment. The purchase price was $8,287.50, payable as follows: .
$200.00 Earnest Money Receipted above to be applied to the down payment
2Cases cited10 opinions
- King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Local Union 1296 v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Moeller v. Good Hope Farms, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
- Gibson v. RouseWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Kessler v. PruittIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Downie v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Smith v. PotterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Langston v. HuffackerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Local 112, I.B.E.W. Building Ass'n v. Tomlinson Dari-Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981