Legal Opinion
Smith v. Potter
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 28, 1995No. 56A04-9410-CV-394PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Ronald Smith appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of Marianne Potter and her stepson, Junior Clayton Potter, Jr. We affirm.
ISSUE 1
Whether the trial court's conclusion that Smith's failure to close the transaction in 1989 extinguished Mrs. Potter's obligation to convey the real estate to him was clearly erroneous.
FACTS
In July 1989, Clayton Potter, Sr., and his wife, Marianne, entered into a real estate sales contract with Ronald Smith. Pursuant to the terms of the contract, the Potters agreed to sell Smith a parcel of land in Hammond, Indiana,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- W & W Equipment Co., Inc. v. MinkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Donavan v. Ivy Knoll Apartments PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- National Advertising Co. v. Wilson Auto Parts, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Nadeau v. BeersWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Dullanty v. Comstock Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
3Cited by9 opinions
- Barrington Management Co. v. Paul E. Draper Family Ltd.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Dfs Secured Healthcare Receivables Trust v. Caregivers Great Lakes, Inc. And Marc LeestmaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Wagner v. Estate of FoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- DRW Builders, Inc. v. RichardsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.