Legal Opinion
Hee Fat v. Wong Kwai
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1916No. 901PublishedCited by 1 opinion
ERROR to Circuit Court, First Circuit. Hon. T. B. Stuart, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
WATSON, J.
This is an action on a promissory note. There was a verdict of the jury in favor of the defendants and the plaintiff brings the case to this court by writ of error. Plaintiff’s complaint in substance alleges that on the 5th day of January, A. D. 1903, the defendants, then being partners under the firm name of Lan Hing Wai Co., for value received, made, executed and delivered under said firm name to Hee Fat (plaintiff in error herein) a certain promissory note in writing of that date, by which said defendants (defendants in error here) promised to pay to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strother v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Williams v. CongerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Rogers v. RitterSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Deardorf's Administrator v. ThacherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Kapela v. GillilandHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goo Kim Fook v. Hee FatHawaii Supreme Court · 1923