Legal Opinion

Goo Kim Fook v. Hee Fat

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1923No. 1422PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PETERS, C. J.

This is a suit in equity for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The mortgage is dated June 9, 1910, and was given to secure a six months’ note of even date for $4000 with interest at nine per cent, per annum. The note is signed by Hee Fat and payable to the Kong Sang Yuen Company or order. Tomg Shee Hee Fat joined with her husband Hee Fat in executing the mortgage by way of a release of her right of dower in the land subject thereto. The ground of foreclosure was the breach by the mortgagor of the condition of the mortgage in respect to payment of principal and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vinton v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Keao Kahumuhumu Kamahalo v. CoelhoHawaii Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Sweetser v. LowellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851
  4. Hee Fat v. Wong KwaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bulatao v. Kauai Motors, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Greenstreet v. GreenstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bulatao v. Kauai Motors, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Goo Kim Fook v. Hee FatHawaii Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API