Legal Opinion

Rinebarger v. Weesner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1914No. 18,532PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Chase district court; Frederick A. Meckel, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BENSON, J.:

This is an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. The defense is based upon the alleged fraud of the defendants’ agent in negotiating the sale. A demurrer to the defendants’ evidence was sustained and they appeal.

The defendants’• evidence tended to prove the following facts: They authorized J. E. Bocock, a real-estate agent, to find a purchaser for their farm at the price of $7500. The agent afterward came to the farm, accompanied by .the plaintiff. After looking over the *304place he came into the house, leaving the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Citizens State Bank v. Shawnee Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Wilson v. German-American InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Kershaw v. SchaferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Madden v. Cheshire Provident InstitutionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schlesener v. MottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Hoffhines v. ThorsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Ratliffe v. CeaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Campbell v. WilcoxenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API