Legal Opinion

Schvaneveldt v. Idaho State Horse Racing Commission

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1978No. 12413PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

The appellant Idaho State Horse Racing Commission suspended the licenses of the respondents, two horse trainers, after chemical tests detected drugs in horses they had raced at Les Bois Park in Boise. This dispute concerns the legality of the racing commission’s suspension of the licenses pursuant to its “absolute insurer rule” without a showing the the respondents were involved in the illegal medication of the horses. The Western Idaho Fair Board, the operator of Les Bois Park, is an intervenor appellant.

Respondent John Treasure, a licensed assistant trainer, entered a horse…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Mahoney v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  3. State Ex Rel. Morris v. West Virginia Racing CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Brennan v. Illinois Racing BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State Ex Rel. Paoli v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arrington v. LOUISIANA STATE RACING COM'NLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Vitale v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API