Legal Opinion

Vitale v. State Racing Commission

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 9, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vitale has appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court sustaining a decision of the State Racing Commission (the Commission). By that decision, Vitale’s license as a trainer of race horses was suspended for nine months.

Kumulus 2nd, trained by Vitale, won a race at Suffolk Downs on December 3, 1978. Routine testing by the commission’s laboratory of a promptly obtained urine sample indicated no drug content. At that time, however, all samples were being tested for the drug fentanyl. For that purpose, the commission used the facilities of the Illinois State Racing Commission’s laboratory…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Barry v. BarchiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 v. Hortonville Education Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Arthurs v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Cohen v. Board of Registration in PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Langlitz v. Board of Registration of ChiropractorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Claridge v. New Mexico State Racing CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Anderson Insulation Co. v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API