Legal Opinion

In Re Moreno

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided March 25, 1999No. 14-99-00149-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

On February 23, 1999, relators, Emilio Moreno and Diana Garay, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t.Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 1988 & Supp.1999). Relators contend that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a bill of review filed by the real party in interest, ArChem Start-up Group. Because relators have an adequate remedy by appeal, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

Generally, mandamus relief is available if the trial court violates a duty imposed by law or clearly abuses its discretion, either in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Petro-Chemical Transport, Inc. v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re DickasonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Hanks v. RosserTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Bayoud v. Bayoud, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Oles v. Curl, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
  2. Mills v. Corvettes of Houston, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  3. Alice M. Wood and Daniel L. Wood v. HSBC Bank USA, N, A. and Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  4. in Re: The Estate of Carolyn C. Hardesty, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
  5. In re EstradaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API