Legal Opinion

In Re Dickason

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1998No. 98-0140PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator Allen Dickason seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to vacate an order granting a new trial. Bécause the trial court did not have plenary power to grant the new trial, we conditionally grant the writ.

In the underlying litigation, Frank McElli-gott sued Dickason for alleged violations of McElligott’s free speech rights and for intentional infliction of emotional distress after Dickason attempted to secure protection from a deposition subpoena. The subpoena was issued in connection with McElligott’s pending divorce from his -wife. McElligott apparently believed that his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Mapco, Inc. v. ForrestTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Buttery v. BettsTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Porter v. VickTexas Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Brookshire Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Custom Corporates, Inc. v. Security Storage, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  4. in Re Vaishangi, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
  5. In Re DarediaTexas Supreme Court · 2010

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API