Legal Opinion
United States v. Alfred Louis Love
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 17, 1984No. 83-1286PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Per curiam
Love appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery of a post office in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2114. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
Love first claims that the pretrial photographic lineup that led to his arrest and conviction was impermissibly suggestive and unreliable. A suggestive pretrial photographic identification procedure may taint subsequent in-court identifications to the extent that a defendant is denied due process of law. United States v. Field, 625 F.2d 862, 865 (9th Cir.1980). The Supreme Court has indicated that “the ultimate question as to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Carlo Scott BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ramon MATTA-BALLESTEROS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Joseph Givens, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Gary Van Pilon v. Amos ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Jose Mario NashCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.