Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Mario Nash
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 4, 1991No. 90-30317PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
Jose Mario Nash appeals his jury conviction for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Nash argues that the district court erred in: (1) failing to suppress evidence seized at the time of Nash’s arrest; (2) not dismissing the indictment because of a Speedy Trial Act violation; (3) admitting allegedly tainted identification testimony into evidence; and (4) denying Nash’s acquittal motion. We affirm.
I. Speedy Trial
The Speedy Trial Act provides a seventy day limit from the date of the information or indictment or the date on which the defendant appears before a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Carlo Scott BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Tommy Ray HigdonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Gary Stephen DominaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Joseph Givens, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Alan James DringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ramon MATTA-BALLESTEROS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. George Benitez Javier Ramirez Jose Camilo LizarragaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin James COLLINS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Glenn Randal FoppeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Raoul Barrie ClymerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.