Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Diné Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment v. Jewell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 27, 2016No. 15-2130Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

LUCERO, Circuit Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.'

My colleagues in the majority conclude that our longstanding circuit precedent allowing courts to consider the four preliminary injunction factors in a holistic fashion has been impliedly overruled by Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 172 L.Ed.2d. 249 (2008). (Majority Op. 1281-83.) I disagree that the Supreme Court has sub silentio reversed a decades-old standard used by a majority of circuits. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent in part.

I

For more than fifty years, we have held that a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API