Legal Opinion

Morten v. Zevalkink

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1943No. Docket No. 33, Calendar No. 42,105Published

1Opinion

The main relief sought by plaintiff's bill of complaint in the instant case is specific performance, although incidentally she seeks injunctive relief and relief by way of cancellation. On this appeal by defendants we hear the case de novo. Upon such consideration I am in accord with the conclusion of Mr. Justice WIEST that the bill of complaint should be dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff's right to institute an action at law.

In the opinions of Justices WIEST and SHARPE the factual background of the case appears; and the record as a whole sustains the following conclusions of fact and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Buck v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Guzorek v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Sutton v. RowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Harmon v. MuirheadMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Harrison v. EassomMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API