Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Rowley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1880PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Hillsdale. Appeal from award of commissioners on an estate. The estate brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Eowley presented and established before the commissioners appointed to determine .claims against the ■estate of Eobert B. Sutton, deceased, a demand of $500 for superintending and completing certain hydraulic works. This claim was affirmed on appeal and is brought before us •on error. The only questions insisted upon on the argument relate to an agreement between Sutton and Eowley to pay for the work by the conveyance of a lot of land. Several different propositions were presented and discussed, but wé do not think it necessary to consider them. There is no •claim that this agreement was in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scott v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Hillebrands v. NibbelinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Colgrove v. SolomonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wallace v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  3. In re Williams' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Thorbahn v. Walker's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Goodrich v. Hubbard's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API