Christison v. Biogen Idec Inc.
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
David Nuffer, United States District Judge
Defendants Biogen Idee Inc. (“Biogen”) and Elan Pharmaceuticals (“Elan”) (collectively “Companies”) move for summary judgment on all of Mr. Christison’s claims (“Motion”).1 Mr. Christison opposes summary judgment (“Opposition”).2 For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED.
CONTENTS
CONTENTS.. .1318
SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD.,.1318
CAUSES OF ACTION.. .1319
Elements of Negligence.. .1319
Elements of Negligent Failure to Warn... 1319
Elements of Negligent Misrepresentation. ..1320
UNDISPUTED…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Martin v. HackerNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. v. FortenberryMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rinder v. Merck Sharp & Dhome Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- Nielson v. Harley Davidson Motor Company GroupDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- Rinder v. Merck Sharp & Dhome Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- Siddoway v. GSK (In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Wells v. Kawasaki Motors Corporation USADistrict Court, D. Utah · 2019