Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 26, 1994No. 14881PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The sole issue in this appeal, on certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, is whether Connecticut law treats a foreign statute of repose as substantive or procedural for choice of law purposes. The plaintiff, William L. Baxter, filed a product liability action in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, alleging that the defendant, Sturm, Ruger and Company, Inc., was liable for the injuries received by his son, Andrew T. Baxter, from the accidental discharge of a weapon made by the defendant. The District Court granted the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Tanges v. Heidelberg North America, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Sanborn v. GreenwaldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. Richard D. Ekstrom v. Value Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  4. Chien v. Skystar Bio Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
  5. Barrett v. MontesanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API