Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1902No. 12,857PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court; H. A. Ewing, judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

The defendant, James Wilson, was charged with a violation of section 3827, General Statutes of 1901, known as the eight-hour law, by permitting a laborer in his employ to work more than eight hours in one day in and about the erection of a school building which defendant was constructing under a contract with the board of education of the city of Iola. The information was quashed for the reason that no public offense was charged. The state has come here by apppal.

That part of the statute necessary to be considered reads:

“That eight hours…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Intoxicating-Liquor CasesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Beach v. LeahySupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  3. Holmes v. . CarleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. Rathbone v. HopperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  5. In re DaltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DaveyArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. KaulSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Joint School Dist. No. 132 v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. State v. BlaserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API