Lee v. Pate

The plaintiff, J. C. Pate, sued defendant, J. W. N. Lee, for damages for certain alleged personal injuries and recovered a judgment for $600. The defendant has appealed.

The defendant presents only two propositions urged for reversal: (1) the lack of substantial evidence to support the verdict and consequent judgment; (2) error on account of plaintiff’s alleged intentional injection into the ease the fact that appellant had liability insurance.

For the reason that it would unduly extend this opinion to quote from the evidence, we state the facts and conclusions therefrom with every inference to…