Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Martin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 27, 1933No. 4-2883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoHaNey, J.

Appellee was employed by appellant to work in its yards connected with its North Little Rock shops. At the time of his injury, hereinafter mentioned, he was engaged in stenciling coal cars. It was usual and customary to do this work out in the yards in the open in good weather, but on the morning of October 23, 1930, the date of the injury complained of, it was raining to such extent that such work could not proceed in the open, and about 1 p. m. of said date, the rain continuing, the foreman caused ten coal cars to be moved under the sheds, and directed appellee to stencil the cars. There…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  2. St, Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TouheySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  3. Ward Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. WeigandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  5. Pettus v. KerrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Caddo River Lumber Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Kroger Grocery Baking Company v. KennedySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. Kurn v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  4. M. E. Gillioz, Inc. v. LancasterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  5. Tucker Duck & Rubber Co. v. HarveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API