Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Summers

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 11, 1977No. 27342PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kelley

The primary question before us is whether section 15-11-203, C.R.S. 1973, of the Colorado Probate Code is constitutional. The subsidiary question, if the first is answered in the affirmative, is whether the court abused its discretion. We hold that it is constitutional and that the court acted properly under the circumstances. We therefore affirm.

Lee Walker died testate on November 4, 1974, leaving real property 1 to his sister, the respondent, with whom he was tenant in common, and the residue of his estate to his wife. His widow, Edythe G. Walker, had suffered a debilitating stroke in 1972…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. SappSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Loup-Miller Construction Co. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Matter of Estate of MerkelMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Young v. C.A.H.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  5. In Re GUARDIANSHIP and CONSERVATORSHIP OF Helen Louise DURAND, Ward/Protected PersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API